Skip to main content

What Grounds Pro-Abortionist’s Claim Of “My Body, My Right”? | Quick iApologia

Pro-abortionists say "my body, my choice" or "my body, my right." Since the fetus is "my body" or the fetus is "living in my body," I have the "right" to cut it out if I want. In their mind, what grounds that "right"?

To answer this, I'm going to really make some controversial claims that some may not like. First, we know that it is scientifically false to think that the fetus is the "mother's body," if one thinks that. Second, we really don't have the right to do anything with our body as we please. First, some things can hurt other people, such as we should not go too fast or there are smoking laws. But even ourselves, we don't really seem to have the right to commit suicide, even though some are trying to make that too a "right."

This is my sandbox blog. I created it so I can get my thoughts out fast. Thus, there may be many mistakes. Please forgive me if my thoughts are incomplete, my spelling may need help and my grammar may be poor. 

To lay the ground work for my thoughts, I'm going to start off with the claim that one who is pro-abortion is NOT a Christian. I did not say "they don't identify as Christian", I said they are not Christian. Also, I'm saying they are not Christian in the present sense. If they repent and turn from sin to Jesus, they can be a Christian. I say this for biblical reasons. Abortion is murder and unrepentant murders don't inherit the Kingdom of God, Galatians 5:21.

Another essential point, all other god's beside the God of the Bible is a false god. This includes the gods of Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, etc. It also includes the god of self as seen in atheism and agnosticism. These are all false religions because the worship creation, not the Creator.

Past cultures, and non-secular, non-Christian cultures, the god's are usually made of wood, stone or metal. Material idols are strange in secular western culture, but I do think they are at the core the same. The god's are not material, rather immaterial, they are our ideas and our views of who we think god is. Isaiah 44 says, these are made in our image.

Either way, we run into a problem that the Bible points out in Psalm 115:3-8, we become like the object of our worship: Psalms 115:4-8 (KJV) "4 Their idols [are] silver and gold, the work of men's hands. 5 They have mouths, but they speak not: eyes have they, but they see not: 6 They have ears, but they hear not: noses have they, but they smell not: 7 They have hands, but they handle not: feet have they, but they walk not: neither speak they through their throat. 8 They that make them are like unto them; [so is] every one that trusteth in them."

Essentially, instead of our moral compass pointing true north, our moral compass is always pointing inward. It points to self, to my thoughts, to my heart, to my ideas. Thus, the idea of "I follow my heart", "I do what's best for me", "I don't want to be burdened", "I don't want to be offended", "I don't want my emotions hurt" ... me, me, me.

Thus, people who have a constant mantra of "my body, my right" are essentially worshiping themselves. They also have not balanced their rights with responsibility. They have not balanced their rights with the rights of others.

However, in a way they do have a right to their own body, but in another way they don't. God has given them autonomy and free will, but the body is still his. Those who want to do what they want to do with it are free to do it, but there are temporal and eternal consequences.

In addition, they also have a smaller number of "moral" items that they are worried about, one being "my right." However, the Christian has numerous moral laws that he or she abides by.  This is why I think we do have rights to our own body, but those rights to liberty and happiness (as the US founding fathers identified) come after the right to life. Thus, your liberty and happiness does not trump your progeny's right to life.

These rights also are grounded upon the person, not the Creator as the founding fathers claimed. If so, these morals, such as rights, are subjective and can be changed at whim. This is why some think slavery, rape and eugenics was maybe moral in the past for past people or for different cultures, but not for today. Our morality says they are wrong now.

When all is said and done, I think people think the line in the abortion argument "my body, my right" because they are god in their own eyes, thus, they call the shots.


Feel free to visit my main site, www.iApologia.com

Stay connected! Sign up to for the latest at iApologia

Thank you to those who donate to keep iApologia going. Any amount is appreciated! Donate to iApologia on Paypal.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Are There Contradictions Between Matthew and Luke's Nativity Accounts? | Quick iApologia

Often people say there are contradictions between the Nativity accounts in Mathew and Luke, is this true? I don't think so. Below I lay out the accounts in a rational and reasonable way that helps bring both accounts together. As you read the below biblical accounts, it may help if you consider the following thoughts: I put some of the verses in bold text. I think of those verses a little like headers or lines that highlight big ideas that need to be expanded on. When we look at the other account, we often find that there are expanded facts that happened at the birth of Jesus that helps give more detail. Mary traveled to the hill country to see her cousin, possibly a week's walk from her town, she stayed for three months. The walk from Nazareth to Bethlehem may have been a week too. So, it would only seem logical that Mary and Joseph were at Bethlehem for at least a few months. To add to that, the Bible also says that Herod slew all the babies of Bethlehem two years and under...

What Do We Make of The Supposed Conversion of Chris Watts? | Quick iApologia

What do we make of the supposed conversion of Chris Watts, the one who murdered his wife and three kids? ​ This is my sandbox blog. I created it so I can get my thoughts out fast. Thus, there may be many mistakes. Please forgive me if my thoughts are incomplete, my spelling may need help and my grammar may be poor. First, we have to remember that Jesus can and does save. If Jesus can't save, then what's the worth of Christianity? Second, this does not mean this guy is really repentant. He likely could be lying, but he also could be telling the truth. We may never know for sure on this side of the grave. However, just because someone identifies with or claims Christ does not mean it is so. Many identify as a Christian. However, being a Christian is more than just identifying as one. The word "Christian" means something; it means one has turned from sin to being a follower of Jesus and his ways. This means many who identify as one but don't live it are...